tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-91021051217711463.post1001359917069756243..comments2023-05-10T03:03:14.001-07:00Comments on Zan On Happiness: You Gotta Give a LittleZan Gaudiosohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15766364742041951322noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-91021051217711463.post-58545762707028347872009-09-16T09:14:32.943-07:002009-09-16T09:14:32.943-07:00Zan, I love your new blog!!!
LisaZan, I love your new blog!!!<br />LisaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-91021051217711463.post-377330549976483602009-09-15T09:49:03.838-07:002009-09-15T09:49:03.838-07:00I love your positive attitude. You may not need it...I love your positive attitude. You may not need it, but I'll positively give you my kidney if you can back up this statement with empirical scientific evidence: "Our physicists and scientists from Einstein to Hawking, Newton to Braden have all contributed to the continued revelation of a subatomic culture that responds and literally rearranges itself according to our thoughts. They are learning more and more about how we interconnect with a field of energy, a superhighway or underpinning of our universe. Some scientists have called it the Mind of God and the Divine Matrix, by whatever name you call it, I think we can all agree that it is a creative framework for creation." That's very close to what Creationists say when attaching their version of a divine matrix to the Anthropic Principle. And if the evidence changes, I get to take back my kidney. Because I'll grant you this, you can be a scientist and still be wrong. Theist's usually aren't because there's nothing to check. Newton was a physicist, mathematician, astronomer, philosopher, theologian, and an alchemist who spent the last part of his life trying to change lead into gold. Neil deGrasse Tyson has said that our data collecting senses as humans is flawed and that's why the "scientific method" is so important.Joe Isuzunoreply@blogger.com